G. JAN MEULENBELD: A History of Indian Medical Literature. (Groningen Oriental Studies Volume XV/I–III.) Groningen: Egbert Forsten (Ia and Ib) 1999; (IIa and IIb) 2000; (III) 2002. Ia: 1 frontispiece, xvii, 699 pp.; Ib: 1 frontispiece, vi, 774 pp.; IIa: 1 frontispiece, viii, 839 pp. (in addition: reprint of 19 pages defective in Ia); IIb: 1 frontispiece, viii, 1018 pp.; III (Indexes):

1 frontispiece, ii, 549 pp. Euro _600.

'I never read a book before reviewing it; it prejudices a man so.' This remark by the critic Sidney Smith is a great comfort when approaching the task of writing a review of G. Jan Meulenbeld's gargantuan A History of Indian Medical Literature, published in five bound volumes totalling 4,020 pages, and including over 36,600 footnotes. This work is a unique survey of traditional

Indian medical literature, born of a scholarly lifetime of reading the texts in the original languages, and noting the important features of their contents, their intellectual and medical innovations, the biographical details of their authors, and very much besides. Few other branches of Indian literature are served by a reference work of this completeness, substance and scope. Pingree's labours on jyotih D s aa rstra and Kane's on dharma are perhaps of the

same order. And as with those works, one may turn to HIML for a wealth of literary and historical information ranging far beyond the medical. Meulenbeld's HIML is truly a landmark work, not only for medical history, but also for Indology as a whole.

Volumes Ia (text) and Ib (footnotes) are dedicated to the foundation works of ayurveda, the CarakasamD hitar, the Susa rutasamD hitar, the AsD t D a rnd gahr D dayasamD hitar and the AsD t D a rnd gasamD graha. The content of each of these major works is summarized in detail, with frequent notes giving points of interest and further reading. Full details are given of all the past discussions about the relationship of these works to each other, and of the dates of their layered parts and the identities of their authors. The identities and roles of the key contributors to the text of the Carakasam D hita r, A¯ treya, Agnives´a, Caraka and DrDd Dhabala, are discussed at length. The persons called Sus aruta and their identities are examined, as well Dhanvantari, Divoda rsa, and the problem of the later revision and expansion of the Susa rutasamD hitar, including the role, if any, of a Na rga rrjuna in this process, are all detailed. The relative chronology of these two works is discussed. As in many other topics, Meulenbeld presents the evidence and past argumentation comprehensively and fairly, and in doing so shows us that the evidence presently available does not warrant a firm conclusion on the matter. The over-confident pronouncements of past scholars, even great ones, are not conclusive. A full survey of the AsD t D ar ndgasam D graha is given in a manner which makes it simultaneously a verse-by-verse comparison with the Hr D daya . Following this, Meulenbeld discusses the dates of these two works, the theories concerning their authorship, and the identity of Va rgbhat Da. This discussion is extremely detailed, covering a mass of data from external sources such as the Chinese Buddhist monk I-ching, and internal ones such as the large number of common verses or ideas in the two works. Meulenbeld is certain that these works are not by the same author. He examines and rejects the opinion of Hilgenberg and Kirfel that the SamD graha is an enlarged version of the Hr D daya, in which verse passages have been changed into prose. Meulenbeld carries the discussion of this problem forward decisively, showing that citations from Nis´cala's Ratnaprabha r and S ´ ivadar sasena's commentary on the Hr D daya prove the existence of a Madhyava rgbhat D a, a treatise intermediate between the SamD graha and the Hr D daya. Meulenbeld notes that the surviving textual evidence makes it 'legitimate to have doubts about the authenticity of the text of the SamD graha as it has been transmitted' . (Ia, 655). To his cogent textual arguments about these works may be added the observation that few manuscripts of the SamD graha survive, and most of those are fragmentary. This fact inevitably raises questions about the history and textual security of the printed editions of the SamD graha on which today's scholars rely. The Hr D daya, by contrast, is represented by hundreds if not thousands of manuscripts from all over South Asia: for centuries it has been the principal school text in Kerala, and in traditional centres it still is. On this complex topic, Meulenbeld concludes that the many problems about the texts and their authors are 'far from even approaching a solution' (Ia, 656). The early compendia called 'the great triad ( br D hattrayi )'—those ascribed to Caraka, Susa ruta and Vargbhat Da—are works that at least most Indologists have heard of, if not studied. But volumes IIa and IIb of HIML will reveal to many for the first time the staggering volume and diversity of scientific literary production in the post-classical period. They survey the thousands of Indian medical works written from about AD 600 up to the present. As far as is possible, each work is described under the following headings: contents, authors and works quoted in the work, its special features, the author and his date, and later authors and works that quote the work. The 'special features' sections deserve particular mention, since they give invaluable information about plants, diseases, or concepts that are mentioned uniquely in a work, or indeed that one would expect to find but are missing. It is especially this detailed analysis of positive and negative evidence, combined with the citations and testimonia, that enables Meulenbeld to place works in a chronological relationship to each other, and to solve innumerable arguments about priority and dating.

Volume II opens up a vast new arena for research. And while all periods produced unique and important works, it is particularly fascinating to see

that the rate of literary production in no way diminished in the later periods.

Authors in the sixteenth, seventeenth and eighteenth centuries produced a rich

and important crop of diverse medical treatises, often describing new diseases,

new theories, new treatments, and new medicines. These facts decisively

contradict the two common opinions that post-classical Indian medicine was

static and unchanging, and that medical creativity entered a dark age after Var gbhatDa. This volume also includes several chapters that will be of interest to a wide range of scholars beyond medical historians. These include the chapters about the pre-modern literature on cookery, on the specialist treatises about pulse diagnosis, on veterinary medicine, on several alchemical treatises, and on the study of gems. Amongst the appendices is a valuable collection of references to medicine found in non-medical literature. This is effectively a research bibliography arranged by title, covering 132 works and genres. Thus, headings such as 'Inscriptions' , 'Jain literature', or 'Maha rbhar rata' give the researcher an immediate head start in studying the medical materials of these fields, and will be especially useful for teachers thinking of pointing their postgraduate students towards projects in medical history.

Volume IIa is completed by a bibliography, the most substantial ever published for ayurveda. This bibliography has also now appeared as a database available for consultation on the Internet. An Annotated Bibliography of the History of Indian Medicine is (in 2003–04) at the address http://www.ub. rug.nl/ indianmedicine/ . It contains some 10,000 entries, and is due to be updated as new publications appear: submissions are invited. The online bibliography is searchable in various ways, including keyword, adding greatly to its value as a research tool. The fifth and last part of HIML, vol. III, provides a comprehensive set of indexes, entirely necessary to provide access to the materials of the first four volumes, where information on related topics can sometimes be widely separated. It is important to read the 'Directions for Use' at the beginning of this volume, which explain some special features of the indexes.

HIML focuses primarily on Sanskrit literature, which is justifiable in view of the fact that the vast bulk of surviving literary material on Indian medicine is in that language. But medical literature in Tibetan, Arabic, Prakrit, Pali, Hindi and many of the other Indian vernaculars are also considered, though normally in the context of their relationship to the Sanskrit materials. Meulenbeld's rich appendices to his 1974 Ma rdhavanida rna had already to a large extent replaced Kashikar's 1956 update and translation of Jolly's 1901 Medicin as the basic survey and bibliography on medical literature. Other important surveys included P. V. Sharma's Ar yurved kar Vaijñar nik Itihar s, and Atrideva Vidyar landka rra's A r yurved kar Br D hat Itiha r s. HIML has now unquestionably become the foundational work on the subject. But its scope is so much greater than earlier works that it cannot sensibly be compared with them. The publication of HIML is a quantum leap in the study of Indian medical literature, and provides so much collateral information on other fields that it is already becoming a necessary reference for general work on Indian culture. A colleague working on tantric sources recently sent me an email that is typical of responses to HIML: 'To say that it's a goldmine, awesome, etc. is an understatement. I can hardly conceive of one person doing all that work in one lifetime'.

In his introduction (Ia, 4), Meulenbeld makes the point that HIML is not and does not seek to be a 'continuous history of Indian medical literature' in the sense of providing what one might call a 'story', having progressive and regressive lines of development, and offering the reader a global sense of the meaning and shape of Indian medical history and its literature. There is a great deal of information on these topics to be found scattered in HIML, and it provides the comprehensive and necessary foundation for such a narrative history.

But Meulenbeld notes that with the publication of HIML, it is now possible for someone else to 'take upon himself the duty of composing a readable, yet accurate and detached, history of Indian medicine and its literature'. One area in which discoveries based on the leads given in HIML are especially likely to be fruitful are manuscript studies. HIML is primarily based on the evidence in published editions of texts, but it also takes careful account of a large amount of manuscript evidence. Inevitably there is much more to be done in this field, especially as new Indian manuscript collections are being catalogued all the time. Thus, a copy of S aan dkarasena's Nar dD ipraka r sa a was recently found in Wellcome MS Indic d 80, a Kashmiri Sa arrada r manuscript datable to c. 1750–1850. This pushes the probable date of S aand karasena's activity back almost a century earlier than HIML 's tentative dating. Such additions to the evidence provided by HIML will doubtless gradually accumulate over the decades ahead, during which HIML will continue to provide the fundamental reference point for research.

Reciprocally, HIML will be a critically important aid to future cataloguers of Indian medical manuscripts. Almost every page of HIML contains nuggets of cultural and historical gold. For example, when Meulenbeld is discussing the Kalyar nD aka rraka by the Deccani Jaina author Ugrar ditya he notes that 'The developed state of alchemy in a [South Indian] treatise from the ninth century can only be explained by assuming that this science originated in Southern India and spread from here to the northern parts of the country much later' (IIa, 155). Such incidental remarks, arising out of the close scrutiny of particular texts, can be expected gradually but profoundly to affect the alignment of many other aspects of Indian literary and cultural history.

The printing of the work is exemplary, and misprints are astonishingly few, which is just as well, given the many thousands of cross-references and citations throughout the text. The volumes are expensive, and this precludes their distribution in India beyond a very few well-funded libraries. This is regrettable, since the scholarship in these volumes will be slow to reach those whose medical tradition is so superbly explored.

DOMINIK WUJASTYK

http://eprints. ucl.ac.uk/ archive/00001069 /01/2004_ BSOAS_ReviewOfMe ulenbeldHIML. pdf